I would be interested in reading the article too, and think it is an interesting debate. I know we struggled to get volunteers when I was with the last charity, and keeping them was hard, some soon realised that it wasn't the cute cat cuddling they thought - even one of the volunteers who just fundraised didn't last all that long. I think Kelly lasted the longest, but can't remember if she did 2 years or not - I personally am aiming for 10 years (have been doing it for 6, but not been as hands on this year, although not entirely through choice). One thing that I have discovered this year is that the less hands on roles are a lot less stressful (unless you are answering phones), not having cats in every room, with the extra housework they create and just going out fundraising and doing the odd home check is easier, but ironically it is now getting to me a lot because i know there are so many cats needing help and I have space and time to do it, just have to find someone to allow me to do it!! I know that fundraising is an important part of rescue, but it doesn't feel like I am helping that much.
The 'I'd love to but' people do annoy me to an extent, as we all have similar issues, but I would rather someone think about it and realise it would be hard for them than go into it without fully realising things and then end up struggling and have to pass the fosters to other people in the group, although some who don't give it a chance might find they would do really well at it. I do believe though that you have to be a special person to be able to take in cats that have been let down so badly, build up their trust/health, devote a lot of time to them, and then be able to hand them over - obviously some foster cats have been let down a lot more than others, and need a lot more time, love and patience, some act like nothing has really happened to them.