i've got to just say that by saying "hope i dont offend anyone but..." doesn't stop people being offended. i have an adorable sphynx cat, who isn't ugly or uncuddly because of her lack of fur. regardless of her "genetic mutation" she is still a lovely cat. i dont ever see people getting up in arms about bengals (a cross between Asian leopard cat and American Shorthair tabby), bombays (Burmese and black American Shorthair), tonkineses (cross between Siamese and Burmese), balineses (mutation of Siamese; tail sways when walking, resembling Balinese dancers) all of which you can see have been created by breeding as with the sphynx, or is because they have fur and therefore are more cute?
i feel really sad about this thread, on a community of cat lovers, is it ok to love cats only if they have fur? my sphynx knows no different to normal cats, she doesn't need a blanket in summer, in fact she goes outside in winter. it's kinda like cat racism going on here.
i've been really offended by this thread, if i started a thread saying i found tabbies were disgusting because they were a little too stripey then i'm sure you'd all disagree with me