Right, as I say the white vouchers are issued by CP HQ and if the cost of the neuter/spay was £5 more than was printed on the voucher then that is why your friend would have paid the difference. However, the vet should not have altered the voucher at all as apart from it being forbidden he would be getting the extra £5 twice, once from your friend and once by adding and extra £5 on the voucher.
Having written all that, I have just clicked you say
the vet gave her this
, do you mean the vet gave her the £5 to pay him? How strange giving her £5 to give him back and then committing an naughty
and altering the voucher. Slapped legs me thinks.
Just has another thought, difficult at my age, you say
and the vets changed it to a £5 one,
Now the vet would only have put the price of the neuter/spay on the voucher (although he should not have, naughty person) why would he have only put £5 and your friend only asked for £5. Surely neuters/spays are not only £10.
Do you know what I think we had better end this as it hurts my brain too much.
All this thinking is not good for me. The most important this is the little one had its 'op'.