Author Topic: Letter from Surrey MP RE: scanning cats killed on roads: NOT Happy!!!  (Read 2535 times)

Offline J (Indoorcatsuk)

  • Distinguished Cat
  • *****
  • Posts: 788
Re: Letter from Surrey MP RE: scanning cats killed on roads: NOT Happy!!!
« Reply #15 on: October 27, 2008, 12:36:15 PM »
I'd write back and ask to see the costs he got together for his conclusions.

Also you may find that if your local rag is a bit slow , they might well cover the story for you - perhaps you could use an appeal to raise a couple of hundred quid to buy your cash starved council a couple of scanners.

If they work like coventry, all bodies get taken back to the depo in plastic bags to be put in the freezer for collection so they can use the centre for scanning so don't need more than two.

Some councils even publish on their website what animals they have picked up.

Councils really should try better!

I absolutely agree that he should give an estimate of these costs.

I remember discussing this with our local CP a few years ago and they said they had offered to buy the scanners and the council still refused to implement a system.
Our council does publish a list of animals found on the road online.

If only these councillors would give up a few fancy dinners or away days where they discuss how to make cost cuts they'd afford it no problem.
A black cat crossing your path signifies that the animal is going somewhere. Groucho Marx.

Offline Angiew

  • Purrs Registered Cat Rescue
  • Honorary Cat
  • *****
  • Posts: 3995
Re: Letter from Surrey MP RE: scanning cats killed on roads: NOT Happy!!!
« Reply #14 on: October 26, 2008, 19:30:33 PM »
I'd write back and ask to see the costs he got together for his conclusions.

Also you may find that if your local rag is a bit slow , they might well cover the story for you - perhaps you could use an appeal to raise a couple of hundred quid to buy your cash starved council a couple of scanners.

If they work like coventry, all bodies get taken back to the depo in plastic bags to be put in the freezer for collection so they can use the centre for scanning so don't need more than two.

Some councils even publish on their website what animals they have picked up.

Councils really should try better!

Offline Kirst

  • Moderating Staff
  • Honorary Cat
  • *****
  • Posts: 5605
  • Slave to: Beavis , Jerry , Gizmo , Stevie and Fredcat
Re: Letter from Surrey MP RE: scanning cats killed on roads: NOT Happy!!!
« Reply #13 on: October 26, 2008, 16:21:04 PM »
My Dad is on the council and will be lobbying our MP - and as he may well be the next PM that can only be a good thing!



Offline Christine (Blip)

  • Purrrrrfect Cat
  • ******
  • Posts: 12648
  • Blip
Re: Letter from Surrey MP RE: scanning cats killed on roads: NOT Happy!!!
« Reply #12 on: October 26, 2008, 16:19:45 PM »
I just wish that we had an option to express a "no vote" in elections an it was compulsory to vote, like, I believe the Australian laws demands, IMO there's be millions of ordinary folks doing this and that'd show the  :censored:s :)

It's called a recorded abstention and I wish we had it here too.  Some people who wish to record an abstention in this country do so by spoiling their ballot paper but obviously I wouldn't dream of suggesting that you do that as it is illegal.
I'm a member of the British Humanist Association, the national charity supporting and representing people who seek to live good lives without religious or superstitious beliefs http://www.humanism.org.uk/home

Offline Mark

  • Purrs Registered Cat Rescue
  • Purrrrrfect Cat
  • *****
  • Posts: 33326
  • Clapton
    • AnimalAid - Support Humane Charities
Re: Letter from Surrey MP RE: scanning cats killed on roads: NOT Happy!!!
« Reply #11 on: October 26, 2008, 16:18:00 PM »
As much as I complain about Canterbury Council, after Sharon spoke to them, they arranged a meeting with Serco and paid for 5 or 6 scanners.
DO NOT BREED OR BUY WHILE SHELTER ANIMALS DIE

I believe I am not interested to know whether Vivisection produces results that are profitable to the human race or doesn't. To know that the results are profitable to the race would not remove my hostility to it.  Mark Twain

Offline Michelle (furbabystar)

  • Royal Cat
  • ******
  • Posts: 7416
  • My Baby - Issey
Re: Letter from Surrey MP RE: scanning cats killed on roads: NOT Happy!!!
« Reply #10 on: October 26, 2008, 15:46:27 PM »
Just heard back from mine

Dear Ms Boyer,

I will certainly sign.

Regards

John Horam


 :cheer: :cheer: :cheer: :cheer:

Offline Michelle (furbabystar)

  • Royal Cat
  • ******
  • Posts: 7416
  • My Baby - Issey
Re: Letter from Surrey MP RE: scanning cats killed on roads: NOT Happy!!!
« Reply #9 on: October 25, 2008, 21:46:14 PM »
What an  :censored: !!

Havent heard back from my PM yet

Offline Yvonne

  • Super Cat
  • *****
  • Posts: 3362
  • Cleo
  • Slave to: Trevor, Clare, Spotty, Homer, Parrot, Cody, strays, Ginger Snaps and Jacob Black.
Re: Letter from Surrey MP RE: scanning cats killed on roads: NOT Happy!!!
« Reply #8 on: October 25, 2008, 21:08:08 PM »
Oh well Debs at least you tried and   :thanks:  for trying
The Purrs 2011 Cat Show!
Could your cat be a winner? 
http://www.purrsinourhearts.co.uk/index.php/topic,37101.0.html

Offline LeighK

  • Super Cat
  • *****
  • Posts: 2108
  • Alfie, Frankie & Leigh, my boys & me
    • http://www.alfie-cat.co.uk
Re: Letter from Surrey MP RE: scanning cats killed on roads: NOT Happy!!!
« Reply #7 on: October 25, 2008, 19:33:27 PM »
No suprise here either :(. One of my biggest regrets is that I didn't emigrate from this country years ago, I'm so utterly sick and tired of politicians, their lies and their hypocracy and their version of democracy "Government by the few for the few", not much left to believe in in this country IMO. Still I suppose there might be a chance to do so in 15 years time when and if I am able to retire, that's one reason why i'm trying to but my own place so that I have something to sell for my retirement, a few happy years dangling my ribs in the sun in the company of cats, can't wait. I just wish that we had an option to express a "no vote" in elections an it was compulsory to vote, like, I believe the Australian laws demands, IMO there's be millions of ordinary folks doing this and that'd show the  :censored:s :)

Cheers

Leigh
« Last Edit: October 25, 2008, 19:53:17 PM by LeighK »
Alfie and Frankie's dad - "Letterbox" are Rockin' the Feline World



Website: http://www.alfie-cat.co.uk



Offline Millys Mum

  • Purrrrrfect Cat
  • ******
  • Posts: 11930
Re: Letter from Surrey MP RE: scanning cats killed on roads: NOT Happy!!!
« Reply #6 on: October 25, 2008, 18:43:50 PM »
Havent heard back from mine yet :waiting:

A scanner costs around £100, hardly stressing the tax payers is it, maybe he should not claim for an essential second home or first class train tickets to make the money available  >:(


Offline Christine (Blip)

  • Purrrrrfect Cat
  • ******
  • Posts: 12648
  • Blip
Re: Letter from Surrey MP RE: scanning cats killed on roads: NOT Happy!!!
« Reply #5 on: October 25, 2008, 18:37:27 PM »
Quote
voted very strongly against the hunting ban

Says it all really. :(

Sadly, it does, yes  :(.
I'm a member of the British Humanist Association, the national charity supporting and representing people who seek to live good lives without religious or superstitious beliefs http://www.humanism.org.uk/home

Offline Ela

  • Royal Cat
  • ******
  • Posts: 9651
Re: Letter from Surrey MP RE: scanning cats killed on roads: NOT Happy!!!
« Reply #4 on: October 25, 2008, 18:35:28 PM »
Quote
voted very strongly against the hunting ban

Says it all really. :(
RULES ARE FOR THE OBEDIENCE OF FOOLS AND GUIDENCE OF WISE MEN.

Offline Debsymiller (Rufus' mum)

  • Cat Rescue
  • Hero Cat
  • *****
  • Posts: 1899
  • RIP Layla and Rufus- love you forever xxx
    • East Surrey Cats Protection
Re: Letter from Surrey MP RE: scanning cats killed on roads: NOT Happy!!!
« Reply #3 on: October 25, 2008, 15:33:15 PM »
That is crazy! Hopefully there will be enough caring MPs out there though who will help the motion be put through

Offline Tiggy's Mum

  • Save a life draw/Commercial Assistant/Moderating Staff
  • Royal Cat
  • *****
  • Posts: 9376
Re: Letter from Surrey MP RE: scanning cats killed on roads: NOT Happy!!!
« Reply #2 on: October 25, 2008, 12:49:01 PM »
Am not surprised, just looked his name up on http://www.theyworkforyou.com/mp/crispin_blunt/reigate and he voted very strongly against the hunting ban  >:(  He did feel it necessary to sign the early day motion for fish and chip shop of the year though  :Crazy:

Offline Debsymiller (Rufus' mum)

  • Cat Rescue
  • Hero Cat
  • *****
  • Posts: 1899
  • RIP Layla and Rufus- love you forever xxx
    • East Surrey Cats Protection
Letter from Surrey MP RE: scanning cats killed on roads: NOT Happy!!!
« Reply #1 on: October 25, 2008, 12:28:13 PM »
I wrote to my MP to get him to support the movement to scan cats that are killed on the roads so that teh owners can be notified and I had an a letter back today. It looks like a standard response with my name and his signature added which shows me that a fair few people must have written to him about this too.
Basically he has put; that while he can appreciate how distressing it is to lose a cat, he can not put anymore pressure on tax payers by making this common place.

For those who are interested, I have typed the letter out:

Dear Miss Miller

Thank you for your letter dated 27th September regarding the Early Day Motion 079.

I appreciate that it is distressing to a family if a pet goes missing never to know what happened to their pets. I also understand that with improved technology and the growing use of microchips could potentially enable the identification o said pets. However, given that the use of microchips is not universal and given the costs that would be incurred by the local authority for the iplementation of the scheme as proposed I am afraid I cannot at this stage support EDM 2079.

Surrey County Council has responsibility for highways and their budget is currently sereverely stretched. The Government has consistently cut suppoyu to Surrey for essential services and this shortfall has had to be met by cuts elsewhere or by increasing reliance on additional funding from council Taxpayers. Given the current state of the public finances I can not support any commitments to additional funding funded nor would I want to place additional burdens on the taxpayer.

Thank you for taking the time to bring this issue to my attention.

Your sincerely,

Crispin Blunt, MP for Reigate.


GGRRRRRR!!!!! Sorry about the typos- in a bit of a rush!

 


Link to CatChat