I wanted to add to this debate, so forgive me dragging it along probably longer than it should have rumbled.
If CP didn't offer this service there would be hundreds more unwanted litters. Publishing the existence of it should encourage more people to come forward and have their cats neutered, at very least take away some advice even if they don't qualify, which is what we all want isn't it?
I think Beth did the right thing posting awareness of this service on Purrs, even if it was in the "wrong" section. TBH that's also a matter of opinion, as other newbies might go to that section first for advice on low cost neutering.
CP are perfectly capable of assessing if someone qualifies for help or not: there's no judgement anyone on here should pass when CP have clearly decided in her favour. The circumstances surrounding the arrival of these two girls is explained in her other thread.
I choose to support CP and the RSPCA by regular monthly donation from my salary because I am in the fortunate position, at this point of my life, to be financially able to do so.
It was not always thus. I feel the support I now offer them is in repayment for the support I received from CP when I was in need years ago.
This is the way the world, in general, turns. "Youth is wasted on the young and money wasted on the old" isn't that the saying?
I can see why the placement of the first post may have raised a hackle or two but she was trying to be helpful. If I'd had the reaction that Beth got I'd feel unfairly treated too. There - said it.